🔗 Share this article EU Could Retaliate to ‘Unwarranted’ US Visa Bans, Spokesperson States The European Union could “respond swiftly and decisively” in response to what it calls “unwarranted” travel bans imposed by the United States against five Europeans working on fighting online hate and disinformation, an EU official has said. EU Officials Condemn US Move as ‘Coercion’ Officials from Europe such as the French president charged Washington of “bullying and threats”, after the travel bans were placed on individuals that were central to campaigns to introduce legislation regulating American tech companies. “For too long, European activists have led organised efforts to coerce American platforms to punish American viewpoints they disagree with,” stated a senior US official in a social media post. “The current administration will not stand for such actions of extraterritorial censorship.” Widespread Condemnation Across Europe Germany, Spain, the UK and a chorus of EU officials joined France in criticizing the move. The restrictions were enacted on Tuesday on a former EU commissioner involved in crafting the bloc’s Digital Services Act (DSA), along with several anti-disinformation campaigners, from two in Germany and two in the UK. An Escalating Conflict Regarding Governance This European legislation is seen by US officials as a type of speech restriction, whereas EU authorities argue the rules are necessary to combat inflammatory language and disinformation. This row risks becoming a facet of a much broader existing cultural and political conflict involving Washington and European institutions. Other Developments Reported Today In related judicial news: A federal judge has blocked efforts to cut security grants to local governments that do not comply with specific federal immigration rules. The judge stated the case was “a further instance” of tying government assistance to policy compliance. Approval was given for the dispatch of hundreds of national guard troops to New Orleans ahead of the new year, coinciding with an active immigration enforcement operation. A Pacific Island nation has agreed to take in dozens of individuals from the US in return for increased assistance, after concluding a formal agreement with US authorities. Additionally, a congressional representative has filed a lawsuit to demand the removal of the current president’s name from a well-known cultural institution in Washington DC. Experts have also noted that comments regarding foreign petroleum resources align with a broader belief in some quarters of “economic expansionism”, drawing comparisons with past foreign policy actions.
The European Union could “respond swiftly and decisively” in response to what it calls “unwarranted” travel bans imposed by the United States against five Europeans working on fighting online hate and disinformation, an EU official has said. EU Officials Condemn US Move as ‘Coercion’ Officials from Europe such as the French president charged Washington of “bullying and threats”, after the travel bans were placed on individuals that were central to campaigns to introduce legislation regulating American tech companies. “For too long, European activists have led organised efforts to coerce American platforms to punish American viewpoints they disagree with,” stated a senior US official in a social media post. “The current administration will not stand for such actions of extraterritorial censorship.” Widespread Condemnation Across Europe Germany, Spain, the UK and a chorus of EU officials joined France in criticizing the move. The restrictions were enacted on Tuesday on a former EU commissioner involved in crafting the bloc’s Digital Services Act (DSA), along with several anti-disinformation campaigners, from two in Germany and two in the UK. An Escalating Conflict Regarding Governance This European legislation is seen by US officials as a type of speech restriction, whereas EU authorities argue the rules are necessary to combat inflammatory language and disinformation. This row risks becoming a facet of a much broader existing cultural and political conflict involving Washington and European institutions. Other Developments Reported Today In related judicial news: A federal judge has blocked efforts to cut security grants to local governments that do not comply with specific federal immigration rules. The judge stated the case was “a further instance” of tying government assistance to policy compliance. Approval was given for the dispatch of hundreds of national guard troops to New Orleans ahead of the new year, coinciding with an active immigration enforcement operation. A Pacific Island nation has agreed to take in dozens of individuals from the US in return for increased assistance, after concluding a formal agreement with US authorities. Additionally, a congressional representative has filed a lawsuit to demand the removal of the current president’s name from a well-known cultural institution in Washington DC. Experts have also noted that comments regarding foreign petroleum resources align with a broader belief in some quarters of “economic expansionism”, drawing comparisons with past foreign policy actions.