🔗 Share this article Russia Seeks Staggering Amount in Compensation against Euroclear over Frozen Assets Russia's monetary authority has declared it is pursuing damages valued at $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This legal step represents a direct response by the Kremlin regarding plans to use immobilized Russian sovereign funds to aid Ukraine. The Legal Claim Based on accounts in local news outlets, the monetary authority filed a claim last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This figure is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion claim. European Union officials are set to decide later this week regarding a plan to use approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. The proposal entails granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its defence and economic needs. The vast majority of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the primary custodian for the Russian frozen financial reserves. Divergent Legal Views European Union authorities have maintained that their proposal is on solid legal ground. They argue rests on the principle that ownership of the state assets remains with Russia, even though it was immobilized in EU jurisdictions shortly after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The Russian government, however, has called any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. It has threatened reciprocal actions, such as seizing EU corporate assets within Russia. The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a prominent position in peace negotiations, stated on X that Russia "will win in court" and regain its assets. He warned that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal. Wider Implications In comments interpreted as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the assets plan as "a vicious assault on the right to ownership and the international reserves system created by the United States." Euroclear refused to comment on the new legal action. It has previously noted it is contending with over 100 legal cases in Russian courts. Legal Hurdles Ahead While courts in European nations are unlikely to enforce judgments from Russian tribunals, experts expect Moscow to seek implementation in countries with stronger ties to the Kremlin. "The Bank of Russia could try to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, provided that relevant holdings can be located," stated a lawyer from an international firm. EU Countermeasures European authorities indicated they are developing measures to deter other nations from aiding any Russian legal action against EU entities. Additionally, they are crafting protections to shield EU member states with assets in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation." How the Funding Would Work According to the complex plan, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would remain untouched. Ukraine would solely be required to repay the money in the event that Russia agreed to pay compensation for the immense damage inflicted during the nearly four-year conflict. Other Funding Ideas Belgium, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an alternative method for financing Ukraine. This involves joint EU borrowing to fund a loan, backed by unused funds within the EU budget. Such a proposal, nevertheless, demands full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has already expressed its objection. Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the reparations loan as "the most credible option" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is based on the Russian frozen assets, which means it is not drawn from our public funds, which is equally significant," she stated. "It also sends a powerful signal that if you cause all this destruction to another nation, you have to pay for the reparations."