🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to resume atomic negotiations with Washington as long as it is treated with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has announced.

The Iranian diplomat stated exclusively dialogue was effective, and shared recent overtures had come from go-betweens to restart discussions with the US government. He claimed Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Iran had not yet reached a point to authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit attacked atomic facilities for safety concerns.

Navigating a Challenging Route

The foreign minister is walking a challenging path since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be proceeding from a stance of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out more resilient defensively and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to enrich uranium domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Discussions Suddenly Concluded

The previous five rounds of talks between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter termination on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that ended with the American leader asserting the sites had been destroyed. Afterward, Western states employed their right to reinstate international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Offered

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was agreed an local partnership with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Representatives asserted repeatedly they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to fall apart due to "detractors in America".

Present Situation

Iran's diplomats declared the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems highly likely the offer could be reintroduced in various formats if discussions reopen.

The US president last week said he had been getting signals that Iran desired to reopen negotiations, but in private Iranian officials claim they are not yet getting clear proposals from Washington either directly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of passivity in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran says diplomacy is not part of a spectacle.

Political Standpoint

In his address to the conference, aimed to depict the US as a dominant force that abuses the idea of international law, Araghchi declared the two-week conflict demonstrated the conflict could not be ended by military means. He stated the attacks commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and concluded with an absolute demand for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with full US knowledge and collaboration, making confidence challenging to restore.

Dialogue Stays the Ultimate Resolution

The foreign minister stated: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned diplomacy; it was America and the European states that had consistently sought to impose their desires during the discussions. Negotiations can still be active and remains the ultimate resolution to settle disagreements, but its standards, guidelines and tenets must be followed."

"Provided that they talk to the Iranian people with the language of respect and honor, they will obtain a reply in the identical language."

Recovery and Rebuilding

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the battle of recovery and rebuilding, the foreign minister claimed he was assured Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We gained multiple understandings from this engagement; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He stated: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to eliminate, continues to exist. The sites and gear, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is essential is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but failed to shatter. The nation of Iran have become stronger, more integrated, and more supportive of the administration and the nation in the aftermath of this invasion."